meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The President’s Inbox

A New U.S. Grand Strategy: The Case for a Realist Foreign Policy, With Stephen Walt

The President’s Inbox

Council on Foreign Relations

Politics, News:politics, News

4.4734 Ratings

🗓️ 26 August 2025

⏱️ 35 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Stephen Walt, Robert and Renée Belfer Professor of International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School, sits down with James M. Lindsay to discuss what a realist U.S. foreign policy would look like.   Mentioned on the Episode:   John Ikenberry, “A New U.S. Grand Strategy: The Case for Liberal Internationalism, With G. John Ikenberry," The President's Inbox   John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, “The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior U.S. Grand Strategy,” Foreign Affairs   Barry Posen, Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy, Cornell University Press   For an episode transcript and show notes, visit The President’s Inbox at: https://www.cfr.org/podcasts/tpi/new-us-grand-strategy-case-realist-foreign-policy-stephen-walt

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the President's inbox. I'm Jim Lindsay, the Mary and David Boyes

0:07.7

distinguished senior fellow in U.S. foreign policy at the Council on Foreign Relations.

0:13.1

This week's topic is, a new U.S. grand strategy, the case for a realist foreign policy.

0:32.0

With me to discuss what a realist U.S. foreign policy might look like is Stephen Walt.

0:38.2

Steve is Robert and Renee Belford Professor of International Affairs at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

0:44.2

He is a columnist at Foreign Policy Magazine and co-chair of the editorial board of international security. Steve is one of America's most distinguished scholars of international relations,

0:49.9

and he has written a vast number of influential books and articles. His most recent book is The Hell of Good Intentions,

0:57.7

America's foreign policy elite in the decline of U.S. primacy.

1:01.7

One of his recent columns in foreign policy that is particularly relevant for our conversation today

1:06.9

was titled The Realist Case for Global Rules.

1:13.1

This episode is the eighth in my ongoing series on U.S. Grand Strategy. Steve, thank you very much for coming on the president's inbox.

1:18.6

Jim, it's my pleasure to be with you. Now, Steve, you are well known as a leading proponent of

1:23.8

the Realist School of International Relations. So let's begin there. What does it mean to be a

1:29.7

realist? I think virtually all realists start from the premise that in international politics,

1:35.7

there is no central authority to keep order, to enforce peace, to make sure that agreements are

1:41.4

kept, and that therefore states, which are the principal actors in

1:45.6

world politics, are forced to defend themselves. They're forced to rely on their own devices

1:51.0

and strategies in order to be secure and prosperous. The implication of that is, first of all, security

1:57.8

can be precarious. You have to worry about that a lot. And that while

2:01.9

cooperation is both necessary and useful, it also can be somewhat fragile, because again,

2:08.0

states worry about others cheating them. They worry that balances of power will shift adversely.

2:14.0

So realists tend to have a rather bleak view of the world, that it's a world of some suspicion,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Council on Foreign Relations, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Council on Foreign Relations and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.