meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

A 4-3 Gerrymandering Ruling by the Wisconsin Supreme Court

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

The Wall Street Journal

Society & Culture, News

42.7K Ratings

🗓️ 26 December 2023

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The state Justices say that Wisconsin's legislative maps must be redrawn because they aren't contiguous. But previous rulings had upheld maps that connect municipal "islands," and the state Supreme Court now insists that remedial districts must be politically neutral as well. Is this really a Democratic power play, made possible by the election of liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

From the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal, this is Potomac Watch.

0:07.0

The Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down the state's legislative maps while pledging to

0:14.7

enforce political neutrality. Welcome I'm Kyle Peterson with the Wall Street

0:18.6

Journal. We are joined today by my colleagues. Editorial board member Colin Levy and columnist Kim Strassal.

0:25.5

The new four-three liberal majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court is already flexing its new judicial

0:31.2

muscle with a ruling on Friday saying that the state's assembly and Senate seats

0:36.8

are unconstitutional because they include districts that are not contiguous.

0:41.5

Now let's listen to a clip of the speaker of the Assembly,

0:44.5

Robin Voss last week on PBS Wisconsin.

0:47.3

Everybody in Wisconsin knows that this is a farce. They have already decided they're

0:51.2

going to draw new maps because Janet Protewich,

0:53.2

for the first time in the history of the country, predetermined cases when she was running for an election.

0:57.6

That's wrong. But we already know what's happening. So it's not some kind of a big mystery

1:01.6

that we don't know we're going to get maps.

1:04.0

Let's remember that Republicans have had this majority in the chamber for 30 years with two years exception,

1:09.5

and that was under maps run by a court, maps run by the legislature, maps run by a federal court, we're going to win again in

1:14.9

2024 because we have better candidates and a better message.

1:17.8

Colin, what's your read of this decision by the state Supreme Court?

1:21.1

235 pages in all including the dissents and then where the debate

1:26.3

goes from here on what Wisconsin's legislative map should look like.

1:30.3

Right I mean there's no question Kyle that this was a completely political decision.

1:34.6

We knew it was coming.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Wall Street Journal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Wall Street Journal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.