I mean the professor seems clearly to hurt the president.

That's why this person wants to be really trying to steer things internally.

You wouldn't come out and do this.

But I think that then why not resign?

But I think a very interesting question here is if this person did it is one of those who

was publicly denied it, what does the New York Times do with that information?

And that's—

And that's—

And that's—

And that's—

And that's—that's why I say that the denials are important because I would assume

that the New York Times would be responsible enough that if someone is out there outright

lying about their participation in something like this, that that would then force them

to out this person if they're lying about it, they know a public figure is lying about

it.

And a senior administration official is they denied someone who has responsibility.

And let me tell you, the idea that someone should be shamed for working in this administration

is an outrageous statement.

It's an absolutely outrageous statement.

You're serving.

So, welcome to the Armstrong and Getty Show.

There's something that didn't think of last week.

...