In one of my recent episodes, I said I don't care if people call me homophobic because that word can mean almost anything.

Homophobia refers not just to people who have a malicious hatred of those who identify as LGBT, but it refers even to people who express

in the most charitable way possible that sexual acts between people of the same sex are

disordered. In my video I even showed how a Catholic

school in Canada removed a book from its library that simply articulated these

Catholic teachings saying the book was homophobic. And now Stephen Woodford

the atheist host of rationality rules wants to give me a taste to my own medicine

in a video called when atheists act like apologists. So in today's episode I'm going to review his

reply to me and show where it failed. So let's take a look. Now what I thought I'd

do is react by using the same rhetoric and indeed bigotry as Trent. But I'm going to switch

the target. The basic argument seems to be that if I don't like Stephen being an atheist who acts like me, then I shouldn't like me acting

like me.

Except as we'll see, Stephen either doesn't act like me or he does act like me and that's totally fine. I won't call

a transgender woman she because that is the opposite of a woman. Suppose I said that I

won't call a Catholic rational or honest because

Catholics are the opposite of rational and honest. I didn't say anything about

LGBT people being irrational or dishonest.

All I said was that their claim that a person with a penis

is actually a woman is false.

Having a penis is the opposite of being a woman.

Sorry, stating facts about reality is not hateful.

If Stephen said he's not going to refer to Jesus

...