Good versus evil. This is something I think about a lot. And I've come to the conclusion that it's not a fair fight.

The good team has virtues such as ethics and morals and tries to do with right.

The evil team by definition lacks virtues. They have no problem breaking the law or playing dirty to complete their objectives.

But the good team will uphold the law. And so if you have an evil hacker in the world

they're not going to play fair or with morals to accomplish their mission.

The Quinded to deceive lie, cheat, threaten, break laws and be reckless.

It doesn't matter what it takes for them to be successful. And the hackers on the good team don't do that stuff.

They're accountable, responsible, honest, considerate and strive to have excellence and all that they do.

And to me, this means it's not a fair fight. One side fights dirty and acts in bad faith and can't be trusted.

All the other can't fight like that. Since their hands are tied to morals and integrity.

But as you get into the weeds, it's so hard to figure out who's good and who's evil.

And what's right and what's wrong? Sometimes you have to break the law to do what's right.

Sometimes good people just don't know they're breaking the law.

Because there's so many stupid laws out there that just should be removed.

And sometimes there's good people with good intentions, but their actions have horrible consequences.

There's also people who seem to be evil, but they're just misunderstood.

What they're doing might be controversial or really hard.

But they know someone has to do it to make the world right.

But with all that said, I still believe this story is about how a bad company hired an evil group to hack into good people.

These are true stories from the dark side of the internet.

I'm Jack Recyder. This is Dark Net Diaries.

We've got a very different kind of sponsor for this episode. My first million.

...