So in a similar line to like the previous sort of round of comments I have, I have, we're

against this union boss, this mob leader, but from the left, from, from the Democrats.

You know, I'd say left in quotations here. But they all decided the Democrats in order to because let's say here's kind of the thesis statement

of the Democrats during this strike. Liam Martin, who I think is like a probably a newscaster

of some kind. That's what his avatar looks like. He's Liam from Boston. So maybe he's a Boston

affiliate or something. He says, feels important to note that the president of the union leading

the port strike has a longstanding relationship with Trump and is causing major damage to a roaring

economy five weeks before the election. I didn't know these were Trump workers. I was all ready to support them and their right to collectively bargain and extract concessions

from billionaire bosses.

I didn't know they were Trump guys, though.

Yeah.

Now I know they have the wrong opinions, apparently.

And so I want them all to be poor.

Yeah.

Now I know that their contract ending now was actually a dastardly strike against the Harris Walls campaign.

Yeah, because Brent Erickson replies, and this is a blue check with some professional headshot photography.

So he's probably a fucking pundit or analyst or advisor or whatever.

He says, well, the timing of the strike is suspect.

No, it's not.

Again, you can't strike until the contract is over, geniuses.

Sorry, sorry it might interfere with the non-campaign.

Sorry it might interfere with your candidate meeting

...