Good morning, everybody. Hope you doing well, Steve Mollin for Free Domain.

A couple more questions, sorry, didn't get to them before.

Steph, I checked your AI and did find reference to your thoughts on government debt, but not

in relation to the below.

Forgive me, if you find this rambling, I'm genuinely curious what you would have to say about

these ideas and perhaps not equipped to inquire properly.

I see debt as an enabler for many of the points

you touch on, for example, allowing governments to become substitute fathers and thus dismissing

the roles of men in families. Further, there have been talk recently about the feminization of the West,

and I wonder if debt may be playing a significant role in enabling caustic feminism,

T.E.I, pandering to special interest groups and ideas that seem distant from reality.

What do you think? Could all this happen without debt as a contributor? Can debt make a civilization

dumb? Yeah, it's not debt in particular, although, of course, that is the word that is used, and I use it as well.

That's the nomenclature that's typical we say government debt.

And saying government debt is like saying human ownership.

It's slavery is really the word for both.

Government debt takes the concept of debt and applies it to the government, as if it is the

government that has the debt.

And government debt, national debt, and so on, all take the concept of debt and tie it to

something external to people,

when of course it's not. It is a form of enslavement. So, for instance, there were

people who would come over to America and to pay for their passage to America, they were

...