meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

6224 How I Fell In Love! Listener Questions Answered

Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

Stefan Molyneux

Economics, Anarchism, Stefan, News & Politics, Atheist, Higher Education, Religion & Spirituality, Stephen, Government, God, Philosophy, Violence, Freedomain, Rogan, Ron, Society & Culture, Radio, Paul, History, Liberalism, Libertarian, Capitalism, Market, Molyneux, Anarchy, Free, Classical, Family, Freedom, State, Joe, Podcast, Atheism, Stephan, Education, Podcasts

4.62.4K Ratings

🗓️ 12 December 2025

⏱️ 51 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Stefan Molyneux explores philosophical questions in this episode, beginning with the issue of creating a universal moral theory that lacks operational tests. He examines Universally Preferable Behavior (UPB) as an alternative to flawed moral frameworks that encourage violence.

He points out the value of keeping moral philosophy simple, particularly when teaching children, and questions the vagueness often found in ethical debates. Molyneux covers the challenges of family relationships, including co-parenting with someone who has borderline personality disorder, and stresses the role of clear communication.

He talks about personal responsibility in the context of social structures, arguing for the recognition of free will in making moral choices. The episode ends with a look at men's responsibilities in building positive family interactions through generosity and kindness, combining philosophical ideas with everyday advice on morality and relationships.

Questions:

"Serious question:
"Can a moral theory qualify as ‘universal’ if it cannot be expressed as a fully operational test, one that produces the same judgment regardless of who performs it, where, or under what incentives?

"In other words:
"Is UPB decidable?

"If so, what is the operational test by which two independent observers, following your method step-by-step, would reach the same moral verdict in every case, including disagreements about property, reciprocity, and externalities?"


"How to coparent with a woman with intense and violent BPD? Young kids involved."


"Why does a man who hates academia have 'MA in history' in his Twitter description?"


"This I think is the deepest question possible or I mean all questions will eventually lead to this one:

"Why should anything exist?"



"Is morality objective or subjective?

"How do we determine objective morality?"



"If a woman was raped in the past, should she be honest with the man she’s dating ?"



"Is a pre-emptive strike, such as the one in the movie Minority Report; convicting a man or woman of a future crime; is that moral?"


"I got a question from a vegan that asked:
"Why should the question if it’s moral or immoral to kill an animal, depend on the animals capacity to understand morality and not just our own ?

"As someone that eats meat, I didn‘t really know a good answer."



"Should UPB replace religion?

"Would it be a religion for everyone or just libertarians?"


"Many men work a lot of hours or away from home. Is it 'fair' for them to not spend as much time as possible with their kids when they can be home, to make sure they are being raised properly by their wife? (not all hobbies, unnecessary projects, sports with buddies in the man cave, etc 'because I work so much and kids are the mom’s job!')

"Why do some men leave all the parenting to the mother, then complain that the kids don’t listen and turned out bad. Seems like many men relinquish their parenting responsibilities and blame the women.

"I understand working takes you away (I was working single mom over a decade) but when I wasn’t at work, my life was making sure kids had everything and I taught them above their grade level anything I though they could understand. PS I’m not talking about sharing housework."



"Do we have free will, or is everything determined?"


"What was it that made you realize your wife was the one?"

SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux

Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1

GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/

Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!

Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows!

You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!

See you soon!
https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Good morning, everybody. Hope you doing well.

0:01.8

Stefan Mullen, you from Free Domain.

0:04.3

And great questions from listeners.

0:07.7

I will go through these in fairly rapid order and see if we can get some tasty brain calories of high protein philosophy into our mental muscles.

0:19.6

All right.

0:20.2

Serious question. Can a moral theory qualify as

0:23.6

quote, universal, end quote, if it cannot be expressed as a fully operational test, one that produces

0:30.1

the same judgment regardless of who performs it where or under what incentives? In other words,

0:35.3

is UPB decidable? So, can a moral theory, if it cannot be

0:41.1

expressed as a fully operational test, the same judgment. So UPB is the antidote to the most

0:50.5

dangerous predator in the world, which is not individual bad actors, not individual

0:55.2

criminals, but false moral theories that result in wars, that result in genocide, that

1:01.5

result in the enslavement of billions of people. It is false moral theories that are the greatest

1:08.5

predators in the world, not individual actors. And of course,

1:14.8

the false moral theories will often try to get you to obey them by making you so frightened

1:21.1

of individual actors that you think you need massive amounts of political control to protect you

1:25.6

and that it turns out, oops, spoiler, the danger comes from the massive amounts of political control to protect you and that it turns out, oops, spoiler,

1:32.7

the danger comes from the massive amounts of political control. The individual criminals were just the boogeyman to scare you into running into the prison planet of stateism. So,

1:38.9

if it cannot be expressed as a fully operational test, I don't really know what that means, but I'm going to sort of take a guess.

1:47.4

And if it's, you know, here's a thing too.

1:48.9

Like, if you want to ask a useful question, then you need to define your terms unless they're very commonly used.

1:58.5

Don't try to be smart.

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 25 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Stefan Molyneux, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Stefan Molyneux and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.