Yeah, no, thanks for meeting. Yeah, I guess what would be the best, what do you think would be the most efficient in our time? Because I mean, I could just randomly pose questions or things, but I wonder what would be like the best structure for our conversation. I think random questions is absolutely the way to go. The randomer, the betterer.

All righty.

Great.

I have your book pulled up to with highlights.

What would be the best thing?

I guess, yeah, there's like high-level questions and specifics.

Maybe the first time I see here is a specific.

I'm just trying to connect with, okay, so in the ground rules, ground rule number one,

where you outline the ground rules of UPB, which, by the way, let me even just say off the bat, right,

just to cards on the table, right?

I think it's a very meticulous, well thought out system that I would describe like,

like if you see a beautiful skyscraper, right?

And it has a functioning elevator, you got the HVAC, the plumbing.

So the building works and it's a better building than what other people construct.

My questions mostly would focus on how the building makes contact with the foundational layer.

And so just as a high level kind of characteristic of where I'll be asking some questions, I think.

But so, okay, in the ground rule one, right, the distinction between is ought, and then the fact

that the human beings generally prefer to live cannot be the basis for any valid theory of

ethics, so we have a ground rule there.

So I just wanted to clarify, because where I was a little confused was on one of the

things in the, well, my pages won't correspond to thing.

But when you get to the section universally preferable behavior, UPB5 proofs, I wanted to

...