We have a follow-up item that we have just been told that we aren't allowed to do

We're starting we're starting tonight with violence I say I would not agree with that

Characterization I would say it was suggested that we

not spoil one of our member specials as an enticement for people to become members

because then they will already know what happens but now they have to become

members to find out and And that was my suggestion.

Not an edict, not a command, but a suggestion.

Let's just say, listeners, that in the latest member special

about the tier list for storage media.

One of the hosts of the show was Down on a medium for being apparently unreliable.

Could you characterize Down? Exactly how down was this host those was me how down like like after?

Like after here is that what you're talking about what tier would you say we've had people right in who who have basically written in to say things like I've read a thousand of them recently and they've all been fine.

Anyway, so all this is to say we don't want to spoil what this is but rest assured

listeners we are getting your feedback and two of the three of us really

appreciate it two-thirds of your hosts are very excited.

Well, see, that's interesting because what I was going to say is I also see all the feedback,

and I think the feedback is pretty much evenly split.

No, no, there is... Pretty much evenly split split. No, admittedly all three of us have biases and priors here, but hand to God, to my eyes, it has been at best, one third in favor of the host who shall remain nameless that is still

very wrong and two-thirds in favor of the other two-thirds of the show.

I didn't actually count them because I didn't think I'd get any resistance to this because I was so clear

from the feedback that I'm getting that it's pretty evenly split.

Oh, please. Go read them again. Well, maybe we should count them up. Here's one of the problems

...