Hello everyone and welcome back to the Roboto podcast where we break down case law, comedy,

and of course chaos in the legal field. I am your host, Red Maisel, and we are going to cover

two cases today. The first one is short and sweetened to the point because it's hilarious.

And the latter one is a bit longer because it covers a saga related to buttocks being used as a potentially very deadly weapon.

I know, I know this is a great episode, y'all. Let's get into it.

This first one requires that you have a little bit of context on obscenity laws.

Now, the U.S. Supreme Court's obscenity standard, right, defining something as obscene,

which can subject it to certain limitations and actually not allow it to be protected by the First

Amendment. There is a reason why we do not have porn billboards up showing photos and images of naked people engaging in sex acts

around the public, right? You would think, well, isn't that First Amendment free speech? Well, yes,

it is. However, certain categories of speech are defined as those which have limited protections

that are able to be censored to a certain extent or at least

be regulated more so than me just yelling on the street would be. Okay. An example of that is defamation.

Defamation falls into another category of speech that we are permitted to regulate limit.

People can sue for something that you say because it falls under

a category.

You're defaming someone.

You're slandering someone.

That would mean you don't have as many protections under the First Amendment.

So with all that being said, the U.S.

Supreme Court's obscenity standard.

Figuring out what's obscene and what isn't, what could subject

...