All right, hi everybody, Svain, from Freedom Main.

And, sorry, it took me a couple of days to get to these questions, but here we are.

Does Georgia St. Peter doesn't have the right to comment on the Russia-Ukraine war,

or is he a psychologist out of his depth talking about geopolitics?

I'm not sure what you mean by the right to comment. I mean, he can talk about whatever

he wants, and it is up to the free market of ideas to determine if what he has to say is

valid or valuable. Does he go into the deep history? Does he talk about the Holodomor? Does he talk

about the mass rapes? Does he talk about the degree of animosity? Does he talk about the Holla de Mor? Does he talk about the mass rapes? Does he talk about the degree of animosity?

Does he talk about the childhood of both the children in Russia and Ukraine?

Origins of War and Child Abuse is a book I read by the late Dr. DeMoss,

which you can get a free domain.com slash books for free

to sort of understand where this stuff comes from as a whole.

So he can talk about whatever he wants to, just as everyone and anyone can.

The real question is, does he have a great deal of value to offer?

And that, of course, is up to every individual to evaluate for himself or herself.

So talk about whatever you want.

I think as a psychologist, Dr. Peterson would have a fairly unique insight

into the mind and childhood origins of this kind of conflict and war.

And hopefully he's talking about that, but I haven't reviewed because I'm not really following the Russia-Ukraine war.

Will Christianity make a comeback in the West, and is this a good thing?

Well, the way that I view this is the following.

Sorry, that's kind of redundant, of course, it's my views.

...