Good morning, everybody, Sivan Mollonie from Freedom Main, here with great questions from

Facebook.com, and let's get right into it with a nice, deep, juicy, political one.

Yeah, baby.

Anarchism, says somebody, right, somebody, anarchism, libertarianism, and liberalism as a whole,

is based on the assertion that human beings are born with

natural rights, that each individual is endowed with the right to life, liberty and property,

regardless of any social or political institution. And the only role of government, if any,

is to protect these individual rights. But if you look at nature, these rights do not actually exist.

Nature is amoral and a species' survival is based on domination either through brute force or cunning

or some other means. The idea of individual human rights seem to be a human construct. Why do

people think that natural rights exist? And if they do exist,

where did they come from? So it's a great question, it's a deep question, a very meaningful

question, and concepts do not exist. You look at forest, there's a bunch of trees that exist,

but a concept which describes the trees or the aggregation trees

as a forest, a concept does not exist.

Now, just because something does not exist, people somehow think that means that it is subjective.

That which does not exist is subjective.

Now, it is certainly true that there are things that do not exist that are subjective.

So Middle Earth does not exist.

And so the map of Middle Earth is not objective.

It does not describe things in the real world.

It describes things in the imagination of 1 J.R.R. Tolkien. It does not exist.

...