Yo-yo, good morning, everybody,

Stafatmoly Newfound Free Domain,

and for the wee Woodwalk.

And got a couple of great questions.

Fantastic, clarifying,

syllables of scrubbing superlatives.

And somebody says,

in the My Toughest Question Show,

Steph makes the argument that incest can be stopped under the NAP

because incest would only occur in situations where one or both parties are too traumatized to give sexual consent.

What standard of evidence is necessary to deem an individual too traumatized to consent?

Right.

So this is a paralysis question.

It is designed, I'm not saying it's conscious, right,

but this is a paralysis question that is designed to turn an answer into a confusion.

It is actually quite annoying and inappropriate. And I actually did address this.

In the actual podcast or the video that I did, but people have a tough time listening.

Sorry, but you all just do. And this is called an emotional defense.

So if I've solved the problem of incest and the non-aggression principle,

a very brief statement being that siblings who perform incest as adults would only do so

because they had been severely sexually abused and traumatized as children,

and therefore they cannot give meaningful consent as adults.

...