Okay, folks, you all listening to Planet Porky. Thank you very much indeed for joining us today.

I want to first of all thank you all for all the feedback we had to Planet Porky.

I have an array of co-presenters now who are of such classic talent in their ability to communicate

that we are becoming world-ren renowned, okay? And I'm delighted

to say today I have with me once again Lord Snooty. His real name is Sam, by the way. But we call

him Lord Snooty because he's got that very melifiless, very posh voice. And he brings a superior sort

of feeling to the proceeding. So, Snooty, may I welcome you once again to Planet Porky?

Well, thank you very much indeed. It's always a pleasure to be here, Mike. I do like the surroundings in Planet Porker, I have to say. It's a very nice environment. It's very comfortable. We feel very at home here.

Very kind of you. It's always nice to get on the rocket and get up here, isn't it? You know? Certainly is. And I have to say, I have a lot of feedback from the last time you and I were in

this studio, Sam, all very positive. People think you're keeping me in line, you know what I mean?

Well, quite right, too. Like as if I need keeping in line. But you look at it from a different

perspective, because of course you are from a different generation to me. You're from the woke generation. Now, first issue that I want to get

on to on Planet Porky today, Sam, is because I haven't seen you since it really erupted, big style.

What is your take on the Duke of York, the position he was in, the interview he did with Emily

Maeclis, and the position he finds himself in now.

Yes, well, I think the position he was in is a little bit of the operative phrase, really,

isn't it? If you think about some of the things that have been going on over the last few weeks and months, this is an absolute scandal, a real outrage, isn't it? I'm absolutely amazed

that a further external investigation hasn't taken place yet to try and bring him to some kind of

justice. What do you think he's guilty of them? I think he's guilty. Well, to be fair, I mean,

if the accusations or the allegations that he was having sex with a 17-year-old, I suppose there's

nothing illegal about that per se, is there? But it's a bit dist say guilty, I say in inverted commas, of course,

I'm saying what do you think morally he's guilty of? Because he's not in front of a trial or a jury

...