meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

5629 Question My Integrity?!?

Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

Stefan Molyneux

Economics, Anarchism, Stefan, News & Politics, Atheist, Higher Education, Religion & Spirituality, Stephen, Government, God, Philosophy, Violence, Freedomain, Rogan, Ron, Society & Culture, Radio, Paul, History, Liberalism, Libertarian, Capitalism, Market, Molyneux, Anarchy, Free, Classical, Family, Freedom, State, Joe, Podcast, Atheism, Stephan, Education, Podcasts

4.62.4K Ratings

🗓️ 6 September 2024

⏱️ 43 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

"In the last couple of weeks, you have repeatedly reiterated your stance that you don't believe in a soul or any other sort of divine essence that could be "dug out" or set free and give people the ability to change. Yet empirical evidence shows that you spend an enormous amount of time talking to people attempting to do just that — showing them the parts of themselves that have been hurt and giving them the tools to protect and nurture those parts in order to heal and improve their lives. You have also repeatedly used phrases such as "selling your soul to the devil", "soul murder", etc.

"Isn't that evidence that you actually DO believe in a soul (even if perhaps it is not immortal and can be damaged beyond repair or somehow sold for material profit) or some similar construct? Because otherwise, it would seem to imply that all of your work is merely entertainment..."


"Hi Stefan, thanks for the forum and time you give to the community, you’ve helped tremendously over the years. I’ll do my best to support more of your good works when I’m financially better able. Onwards, my question is what constitutes a genuine or acceptable apology from a parent to a child regarding verbal and physical abuse sustained during the childhood? for example hypothetically would a simple “I’m sorry” cover it? if genuine or would you see it necessary for a more detailed and context based apology? If this has been asked and answered before, feel free to skip if so, and thanks again!"


"Hi Stef, I’ve been thinking recently about the idea of living a life guided by rational and moral principles at which point the question emerges. What does it mean to be rational? I think you have done some great work on elaborating on what it means to be moral, but I still find myself unsure about rationality (perhaps due to my lack of research).

"As such here is my question. Is it rational for parents to hit their children? If rationality is seen as behaving in such a way that you make a perceived outcome more likely, are parents acting rationally in this case? If what they want is their children’s obedience, or to socialise their children to be able to fit into the world as it is, is it irrational for them to hit their children?"

Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!

NOW AVAILABLE FOR SUBSCRIBERS: MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING' - AND THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI AND AUDIOBOOK!

Also get the Truth About the French Revolution, the interactive multi-lingual philosophy AI trained on thousands of hours of my material, private livestreams, premium call in shows, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!

See you soon!

https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2022

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Good morning, everybody.

0:01.0

Stophane, Mr. Main.

0:04.6

Little bit of time before the Sunday morning show, I hope you will.

0:09.8

Check out the great content.

0:11.2

We're going to do this on locals locals and I'm going to take the more spicy

0:15.9

questions after the first hour so I hope you'll come by and check it out also don't forget

0:29.2

that you can go to fjrr urrrrrrrrrrrr winter. All right questions in the last couple of weeks you have repeatedly reiterated your stance that you don't believe in a soul or any other sort of divine essence that could be dug out or set free and give people the ability to change.

0:42.0

Oh no. Okay, you know, this... No.

0:43.0

Okay, you know, this is just so you understand, right?

0:47.0

So you understand what it looks like from somebody with a tiny smidger two of wisdom.

0:52.0

So, tiny smidge or two of wisdom.

0:53.4

So when I read a question, what I do is I scan for triggered volatility,

1:03.7

volatility, but hurt, defensiveness, aggression, manipulation,

1:08.2

because what I want to know is, is someone genuinely curious and arguments and is someone upset at my arguments and is kind of hitting back and usually below the belt.

1:25.0

And so you need to have the self-knowledge, you just, this is just a basic, basic thing to interact with anybody with any wisdom. You need to have the

1:36.4

self-knowledge to know why you are asking the question and be honest about why you are asking the question.

1:45.2

Otherwise you look incredibly manipulative and it's kind of annoying.

1:52.2

And maybe this won't make sense until I sort of explain it right?

1:58.1

So if something I'm saying is upsetting to you that's totally fine. If it's any consolation stuff I

2:07.0

arguments I come up with and data that I come across is upsetting to me sometimes as well.

2:12.9

So if something I'm saying is upsetting to you,

2:16.2

you need to have the self-knowledge

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Stefan Molyneux, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Stefan Molyneux and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.