Good morning, hope you're doing well.

It's bright and early in the AM, and we are going to do a little bit of work of dry analytical philosophy.

Now, this may lack some of the fire and brimstone

of my other kinds of philosophical teachings

and live streams, but sometimes I think

there's a certain amount of detail and precision that's just very helpful to go through and so let's do something

maybe just a tiny bit dry but for me

kind of the heart and essence of philosophy. So this is something

some incentive to me called the anti-subjectivist manifest of the case for

consent and here is how I go about analyzing a document I've given it a quick skim, I haven't finished it, but let's do it live.

It's a nice quote from Socrates.

It is not difficult to avoid death, gentlemen.

It's much more difficult to avoid wickedness

for it runs faster than death.

You know, it's interesting and fun.

Doesn't help you much in life, but it's kind of fun.

All right. So we start with this is going to be a

moral treatise. So this is similar to UPP or the Nennekimachian ethics from Aristotle or I guess the case for normative ethics from Kant and so on. So we're going to have a look at this and see how it does

So it says the nature of the manifesto is to inform others

Okay to profess some great insight motivation of course in a manner that is both poignant and powerful.

Our goal with this piece is to do just that for an ethical theory known as anti-subjectivism,

a theory that not only offers a normative framework for determining

...