5506 UPB and Sex!
Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux
Stefan Molyneux
4.7 • 2.4K Ratings
🗓️ 21 May 2024
⏱️ 18 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
"Is the failure of parents to secure a safe environment for their children to be raised in unethical if they had the chance to do so? If so, does this mean that we can create a term like retrospective ethics, which refers to ethical judgments that are validated only by looking backwards in time after the consequences are played out instead of through reason alone? Before the ethical judgments are validated, they are simply speculative, so maybe they can be referred to as speculative ethics before consequences validate or invalidate the judgments. The main problem I found with this reasoning is in finding the first cause. If promiscuity is unethical only when certain consequences occur, why do we focus on the act of sex rather than the preceding acts such as the flirtation and escalating behaviors? How would we locate the first domino that kick-started this unethical chain in order to assign ethical judgment to the correct behavior? Is this why UPB and ethics as a whole cannot be based on consequences?"
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Get my new series on the Truth About the French Revolution, the Truth About Sadism, access to the audiobook for my new book 'Peaceful Parenting,' StefBOT-AI, private livestreams, premium call in shows, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and more!
See you soon!
https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2022
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Well, we're well, Stephen Mollie from Freed domain. |
| 0:04.0 | These are some great questions from the community at freedomane. |
| 0:07.0 | Local.com. Hope you will check out the community, |
| 0:10.0 | Free Domain. Locals.com. |
| 0:12.0 | Hey, Steph, what are your thoughts on the ethics of action? community free domain dot locals.com. |
| 0:13.0 | Hey Steph, what are your thoughts on the ethics of actions that are in the immediate moment not unethical, |
| 0:19.0 | but in the long run have the risk of becoming so? |
| 0:22.0 | Let's say for example you develop a sexual |
| 0:23.8 | relationship with women only for the sake of satisfying your vanity |
| 0:26.3 | insecurities and sexual needs without the intention of a long-term |
| 0:28.8 | commitment. If this action is between two consenting adults and doesn't violate the NAP or UPP, it can't be called unethical. |
| 0:35.0 | However, should a pregnancy occur, either the resulting abortion or the child raised by two parents who are only drawn together by lust, has the potential for unethical outcomes. |
| 0:44.9 | The promiscuity isn't unethical if both parties are honest about what they're doing, but |
| 0:50.1 | the consequences can spiral into unethical territory. |
| 0:53.4 | What then is the ethical status of promiscuity if it is voluntary? |
| 0:57.1 | Is the correct word irresponsible rather than unethical? |
| 1:01.0 | Is the failure of parents to secure a safe environment for their children to be raised in unethical if they had the chance to do so? |
| 1:08.0 | If so, does this mean that we can create a term like retrospective ethics which refers to ethical judgments that are |
| 1:13.7 | validated only by looking backwards in time after the consequences are played out instead of through |
| 1:18.8 | reason alone. |
| 1:19.8 | Before the ethical judgments are validated, they are simply speculative, |
| 1:22.6 | so maybe they can be referred to as speculative ethics before consequences |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Stefan Molyneux, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Stefan Molyneux and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

