So Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. was asked, I assume by some leftist, he had his genuine proletariat

little hat on. He was asked about sort of two questions and I'm sorry to sound so weary,

but it's just so sad how little thought people put into these questions or these answers.

So the question was twofold,

and it was around freedom of speech. So the first question was, well, what if somebody's

directly inciting violence? Should that not be a violation of freedom of speech and banned

and shut down and so on? It's like, all right, all right. Well, first of all, there are laws

against that already, so you don't need anything extra.

But I guess the question I would have is there are tens of thousands of outright Marxists

in Western universities teaching impressionable youth, and Lord knows how many there are in public schools as a whole.

Now, Marxism explicitly calls for a violent overthrow, a bloody

revolution and so on, in order to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat and the eventual

utopia of the stateless society. So I suppose if people were really fussed and bothered and concerned about, I don't know,

speech that not only theoretically in its language promotes the use of political violence and

terrorism to change the world, but, you know, the communist revolutions have actually been

enacted around the world and have caused the slaughter of well over

100 million people. So it would seem to me that if anybody was concerned about, I don't know,

political violent speech that the first thing they would say is, man, we got to ban all of

these communists, you see, because communism is explicitly

violent in its formulation theory, execution, and practice. But, of course, they never

why does nobody talk about this? I don't understand the world. I don't, and this is so blindingly

obvious, right? Oh, promotion of violence.

...