meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

5435 World Full of Idiots?

Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

Stefan Molyneux

Freedom, Politics, Objectivism, Freedomainradio, Anarchy, Democrat, Liberal, Republican, Libertarian, News & Politics, Joe-rogan, Objectivist, Atheism, Philosophy, Atheist, Conservative, Pacifism

4.72.4K Ratings

🗓️ 12 March 2024

⏱️ 46 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

"The Secular model does not have God in it, so it also does not have soul, nor conscience and freewill either, since those are embedded in soul. However, in reality conscience and freewill clearly exist. Therefore, the secular model is clearly false, fake and gay. Apart from that, one reason Christianity is superior to philosophy is that idiots can't understand philosophy, and the world is mostly idiots."

Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!

Get my new series on the Truth About the French Revolution, access to the audiobook for my new book 'Peaceful Parenting,' StefBOT-AI, private livestreams, premium call in shows, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and more!

See you soon!

https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2022

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Good morning, everybody.

0:01.5

Steve Moldy from Free Domain and got an email from a listener who makes the following case.

0:11.7

The secular model does not have God in it, so it also does not have the soul, nor the conscience,

0:20.3

nor free will either, since those are embedded in the soul.

0:24.1

However, in reality, conscience and free will clearly exist. Therefore, the secular model is

0:30.6

clearly false and fake. Apart from that, one reason Christianity is superior to philosophy

0:36.1

is that idiots can't understand

0:38.7

philosophy and the world is mostly idiots. It's a very short, succinct, and vivid argument,

0:46.1

and I appreciate that. I appreciate the argument. I appreciate the criticism. And I certainly do,

0:51.8

as always, appreciate the challenge to respond.

0:55.9

This is a good argument which says we can judge the existence of something by its effects,

1:01.1

even if we cannot perceive it directly.

1:03.2

We can't see gravity like a thing, like an object.

1:06.0

We can't see gravity, but we see its effects and feel its effects all the time.

1:10.4

The argument would be you can't see

1:13.3

air, but we know physiologically that we breathe air. Air contains oxygen. Oxygen is necessary

1:21.7

for our eyes to function. Therefore, the fact that our eyes are working, even though our eyes can't see air, the fact that

1:29.6

our eyes are working means that the air exists. And that's good. That's good. If you're in

1:37.0

jail cell and you can only see the shadow in the courtyard, you can't see the object casting

1:42.4

the shadow, but you can see the shadow. Therefore,

1:44.8

you know the object exists. You may even know some, if it's an obelisk or the statue of a man

1:50.5

on a horse, you would have some idea. So you don't have to perceive the thing directly.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Stefan Molyneux, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Stefan Molyneux and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.