meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

5435 World Full of Idiots?

Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

Stefan Molyneux

Pacifism, Freedom, Philosophy, Liberal, Atheism, Objectivist, Conservative, Objectivism, Democrat, Libertarian, Anarchy, Joe-rogan, Politics, Republican, News & Politics, Atheist, Freedomainradio

4.72.4K Ratings

🗓️ 12 March 2024

⏱️ 46 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

"The Secular model does not have God in it, so it also does not have soul, nor conscience and freewill either, since those are embedded in soul. However, in reality conscience and freewill clearly exist. Therefore, the secular model is clearly false, fake and gay. Apart from that, one reason Christianity is superior to philosophy is that idiots can't understand philosophy, and the world is mostly idiots."

Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!

Get my new series on the Truth About the French Revolution, access to the audiobook for my new book 'Peaceful Parenting,' StefBOT-AI, private livestreams, premium call in shows, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and more!

See you soon!

https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2022

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Good money, everybody.

0:02.0

Steve I'm on you from Free Domain and got an email from a listener who makes the following case.

0:11.0

The secular model does not have God in it, so it also does not have the soul,

0:19.2

nor the conscience, nor free will either, since those are embedded in the soul, however in reality conscience

0:26.5

and free will clearly exist. Therefore the secular model is clearly false and fake.

0:33.4

Apart from that, one reason Christianity is superior to philosophy is that idiots can't

0:38.2

understand philosophy and the world is mostly idiots.

0:41.6

It's a very short succinct and vivid argument,

0:46.0

and I appreciate that.

0:48.0

I appreciate the argument.

0:49.0

I appreciate the criticism.

0:50.0

And I certainly do, as always appreciate the challenge to respond. This is a good

0:57.7

argument which says we can judge the existence of something by its effects

1:00.9

even if we cannot perceive it directly.

1:03.0

We can't see gravity, like a thing, like an object.

1:06.0

We can't see gravity, but we see its effects and feel its effects all the time.

1:10.0

The argument would be, you can't see air, but we know physiologically that we breathe air.

1:19.0

Air contains oxygen. Oxygen is necessary for our eyes to function there therefore the fact that our eyes are

1:26.1

working even though their eyes, our eyes can't see air.

1:29.2

The fact that our eyes are working means that the air exists.

1:33.4

And that's good.

1:35.2

That's good.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Stefan Molyneux, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Stefan Molyneux and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.