Hey, Prime members, you can listen to Real Crime Profile ad-free on Amazon Music. Download the app today.

What can you tell us about what Modesto Police have gathered so far from the body?

We're still trying to find out the identity of the body.

And one of the key questions we're trying to answer right now is whether or not there's any relationship between the adult female and the baby male that was found from two days ago.

Hey lovely listeners and welcome to Real Crime Profile. I'm Laura Richards, Criminal Behavioral Analyst, former New Scotland Yard, and host of the podcast Crime Analyst. And with me today is...

Jim Clemente, retired FBI Profile Reform in New York City Prosecutor and writer producer of CBS's Criminal Minds. And Paramount Plus is Criminal Minds Evolution. And also...

And I am Lisa Zambay, I'm a casting director of Real Interest in Real Crime and these minds that solve these crimes were continuing our analysis of the murder of Lacey and Connor Peter San and Jim and Laura.

It is so astonishing to me that the more counter theories I learn about, the more new evidence I read in Cross Check and Wacomall, all the ones that pop up.

And it's all in terms of throwing blame at anyone except Scott Peterson. And the more that I read, the more convinced I am that the right person is in prison and so many people are trying to get us to look over there, look over there.

You know, don't look at the man behind the curtain, but it seems to me the man behind that curtain is Scott Peterson, just the more that I learn about this case.

Yeah.

It's fascinating, really, isn't it? And I have to say when I started out on this journey of looking at this case, from listening to those who I have found compelling in the past, make a very clear case for his innocence, that's where I was coming from.

I really thought there could well be more to this. So that was the position that I started from. And now it's been months that I've been analyzing and researching and going back to some of the testimonies as well.

And I just think it's so astounding that the overwhelming and compelling circumstances and the circumstantial evidence, it really does point in one direction.

And as I said before, how many passes do you give someone? And one of the things I wanted to pick back up on, we talked about the media interviews, didn't we, the four that Scott Peterson gave at the end of January 2003.

So it's almost four weeks that Lacey and Connor were missing for. So that's a long time. We talked about Diane Sawyer's interview.

There was a Gloria Gomez interview as well. And there were two points that she not showed about the interview about what stood out to her.

And what she basically said was that Scott had declined to answer some of the questions and that he had said to her that we're starting to go into where is the investigators have asked me not to comment about.

So we should probably simply put the brakes on. And what she found out thereafter was having shown the detectives, the tape of that interview, the detective said to her, we never told him not to answer questions.

That wasn't what we said. So I think that's very interesting that she cooperated it. She was doing her due diligence and found out that's not what detectives had said to Scott.

It's not like the case was going to court, right? And therefore in the UK, it's subjudiced. So you might say to someone, please don't discuss a B or C, but that's not what was going on here.

No, and it would be ridiculous for the cops to tell Scott not to discuss certain facts. I mean, they'd love it if he discussed certain facts because then he's putting himself on a record.

...