A few years ago, I started working on a book called SpaceX Foundation.

A historical account of SpaceX's first decade told through firsthand sources,

firsthand sources like Elon's company updates, launch dispatches, internal memos.

This is the real-time record of a company that almost died three times and then became

the most dominant launch provider on Earth.

The gap between SpaceX and

everyone else is enormous and widening. Yet most of what's been written focuses on Elon himself,

not on the specific methods, cultures, and decisions that actually built the company. That is what

the book is about. While the book is still in progress, I've been writing an introduction essay as a way to work through the central question.

Why did SpaceX succeed in ways no one else has been able to replicate?

And more importantly, is any of it learnable?

The practices that made SpaceX dominant aren't't unique to rockets they're a blueprint for

building anything hard that's the introduction to this introduction essay of this book so the introduction

essay is called atoms are cheap process is pricey what spacex teaches us about building hard things

it is written by max olson who is writing that book called SpaceX Foundation.

I've read this essay three times. I think it's really good, so I want to go through some of the

main ideas with you. And so the essay starts like this. SpaceX has been remarkably open about how

they operate. They've been succeeding in public for more than 15 years now, and yet no one has

replicated the results. Competitors know their strategy.

The engineering philosophy gets explained in interviews, tweets, and factory tours.

Many of the ideas aren't even new.

Lockheed's Skunkworks ran similar approaches 60 years ago.

...