meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Accidental Tech Podcast

285: Do Not Drill Holes in This House

Accidental Tech Podcast

Marco Arment

Technology

4.42.4K Ratings

🗓️ 30 July 2018

⏱️ 122 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Sponsored by:

  • Casper: Get $100 off the Casper Wave mattress with code atp100. Terms and conditions apply.
  • Squarespace: Make your next move. Get 10% off your first order with code ATP.
  • Simple Contacts: Renew your contact-lens prescription with our online vision test, and save $20 on your contacts with code ATP20.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Don't hear anything. That's probably not good. Yeah, probably not oh I know why

0:06.5

Dumbass your headphones aren't plugged in and they're still not so whatever you're saying I can't hear

0:13.0

Hi, I'm back. How's that better?

0:16.1

Turns out that works a little better. Oh god, please don't put that in the show

0:20.4

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, what are the odds of that?

0:28.2

Vince Pavlish writes in and says I'm a lawyer and the feedback you got about subsequent remedial measures may have been misleading

0:35.0

No way a lawyer related law thing misleading you don't say there are a lot of exceptions to the rule to the point that the rule is basically

0:42.4

Pointless and if Apple made a statement that the old keyboard was defective that could and would definitely be used against them

0:48.8

Obviously the case would never go to trial and this would just be for settlement value or whatever

0:52.7

It survived a motion to dismiss your initial intuition was probably right and they aren't saying it's a fixed per legal reasons

0:58.9

The law is complicated. I was just waiting for this email so nice

1:01.9

It's so nicely tied up in a little bow so straightforward one of our emails. It's like all right now wait wait for it wait for it and

1:08.8

Next layer, yep, well, and in fact Josh Fenn the lawyer who wrote the first one wrote to me earlier today

1:14.5

I think you I think he didn't copy the feedback address, but he wrote to me earlier today

1:17.8

saying basically he wanted to correct this that he made a mistake in not telling us that

1:24.4

apparently

1:25.4

This does not apply to product defect cases in California

1:32.6

Specifically that so

1:35.1

So yeah, it's definitely there definitely is no reason for Apple to come out and say we fixed it because it sucked before

1:43.1

Because that could be a problem for them. Oh, man. That's funny and finally since we still only added days were the follow up to accumulate

1:50.4

Is it a non-tech? I think that's how you pronounce it. I hope

1:53.8

Has an article wherein they state Intel 10 nanometer production updates systems will be on shelves for holiday 20 to

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Marco Arment, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Marco Arment and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.