meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

#224: Kentucky: 5, Michigan: 2

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Heritage Foundation

Government

4.5527 Ratings

🗓️ 15 March 2018

⏱️ 32 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This week, Elizabeth & Tiffany talk about cases challenging capital punishment, Seminole Rock deference, and more! They also chat with John Elwood about SCOTUSBlog's Relist Watch and his argument pump up songs. Tune in for Supreme Trivia to find out how Kentucky is beating Michigan at SCOTUS.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I'm Elizabeth Lattery and I'm Tiffany Bates.

0:09.6

Welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court,

0:13.5

what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government.

0:17.7

This week we're talking about Justice Thomas's recent speech,

0:22.1

big cases coming up for conference, and we'll interview appellate lawyer John Elwood. So Justice Clarence Thomas spoke at the

0:27.3

Federalist Society Student Symposium, and Tiffany, you were in attendance. I was. Yeah, so tell us

0:32.4

about his talk. Yeah, it's always a pleasure to hear Justice Thomas Speak and this time was no different.

0:38.5

It's not just me.

0:39.2

The crowd loved him.

0:41.1

When he was introduced, he got a standing ovation.

0:44.1

Of course.

0:44.7

And he gets so much, yeah, flack from the left.

0:47.3

It was really nice to see these 800 or so law students who really admire him, you know, showing him some love.

0:53.3

The format was conversation style

0:55.4

with Jen Maskot, a GMU professor, and his former law clerk. And she asked him a lot of really

1:00.7

thoughtful questions. He talked briefly about textualism and how it's just such a natural thing

1:05.9

because words have meaning. And he said, I think we're all textualists. When you see a stop sign, you

1:11.7

stop. You don't say, oh, officer, I was looking at it more in a normative way, which was really

1:17.4

funny. There were quite a few questions that he brought back to the topic of civility. He said he was

1:23.9

reading a book about the tutors, and he thinks it's like we're going back to the

1:28.7

Tower of London except we're executing people with words and attacking people and not just ideas.

1:34.7

And he spoke of Justice Ginsburg and said, you know, she's not my enemy. She's my colleague

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.