This week, on the Word of the Lord Indoor's Forever, we continue our adventures in acts with Peter

welcomes Cornelius' delegation. Peter arrives in Cesarea, Gentiles here the Gospel,

the Gentiles' Pentecost, and Peter's Report to the Church. Join me, Pastor Will Whedon,

for the Word of the Lord Indoor's Forever, your daily 15-minute, verse 5, verse 5,

Bible Study on Demand. Listen at the Word Indoor's.org, or your favorite podcast provider.

So let us look at John 20, verse 30. It says,

Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of his disciples that are not written in this book.

This verse alone entirely contradicts the teaching of Soluscript through that because

it says that there's things that Jesus did that were not written down.

That's Roman Catholic Apologist Vanessa Forsblad speaking on her YouTube channel,

that one Catholic girl. Is it true? Does John 20, 30, undo scriptural loan? Does the fact that

not everything Jesus said or did was written down or recorded mean that there must be another

supplemental source of authority for the Church, namely sacred tradition, in addition to

holy scripture. Greetings and welcome to issues, etc. coming to you live from the studios of

Lutheran Public Radio in Collinsville, Illinois. I'm Todd Wilkin. Thanks for tuning us in.

Our series responding to Roman Catholic proof text continues with Dr. Stephen Parks today.

John 20, 30 and scriptural loan. We'll spend some time with you, our listeners via email and the

issues, etc. comment line. Dr. John Bimbara will round everything off today. The Christian and

the resurrected Jesus will be our subject. He's authored a series of columns titled Resurrection

Life for Resurrection People. Dr. Stephen Parks is associate professor of theology and philosophy at

Concordia University Irvine, California. Dr. Parks, welcome back. Thank you for having me, Todd.

Much appreciated. Why are so many Roman Catholics opposed to the idea of scriptural loan?

...