2/2: #Bestof2021: Observing the SEC aim to regulate the troubled cryptocurrency. 2/2: Our regulatory agencies and their abduction by “interests.” @RichardAEpstein (Originally posted August 3, 2021)
The John Batchelor Show
John Batchelor
4.5 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 26 December 2022
⏱️ 7 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
October 25, 1929
@Batchelorshow
2/2: #Bestof2021: Observing the SEC aim to regulate the troubled cryptocurrency. 2/2: Our regulatory agencies and their abduction by “interests.” @RichardAEpstein (Originally posted August 3, 2021)
Theory of Regulatory Capture* by the Regulated. Richard A Epstein, Tisch Professor of Law NYU Bedford Senior Fellow; Hoover Institution; senior lecturer, University of Chicago Law School. @RichardAEpstein
https://promarket.org/2021/07/22/george-stigler-theory-economic-regulation-interest-group-politics-industry/
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is CBS. I am the world. I'm John Batsworth, Professor Richard Epstein of the Hoover Institution. |
| 0:10.5 | We're discussing competitiveness, anti-competitiveness, monopoly, |
| 0:15.4 | bigness, but I want to get very specific here because Richard's colleague, Cass Sunstein, |
| 0:20.3 | who has served honorably in one or more administration, certainly in the Obama administration, |
| 0:26.5 | and now, sympathetic to the Biden administration, has written in protest of George Stigler's idea |
| 0:33.0 | that industry acquires the regulatory body or makes the regulations work for the industry. |
| 0:40.6 | And he objects on the basis of several instances where he participated during the Obama administration |
| 0:48.3 | in new regulations. The one that seems most neutral to me, Richard, Mr. Sunstein writes, |
| 0:53.1 | in 2014, the Department of Transportation issued a final rule, mandating rearview cameras |
| 0:58.8 | in new motor vehicles. The rule was strenuously opposed by the automobile companies. |
| 1:03.7 | It was projected to impose more than 600 million in annual costs. Mr. Sunstein, if I understand |
| 1:09.6 | correctly, is saying, this was for the public good. We did it without factionalism in the government, |
| 1:15.9 | and the industry did not benefit from it. Do I read him correctly and is he accurate? |
| 1:20.7 | Well, I mean, it's complicated again. There's certainly the following argument that could be made |
| 1:26.3 | in favor of what Cass said, which is there are a large number of accidents that take place because |
| 1:31.0 | people have imperfect knowledge of what's going on behind them. Generally speaking, if you're trying |
| 1:36.5 | to talk about accidents, the basic theory says, whenever you're in transition, landing a plane, |
| 1:41.7 | taking off and so forth, is the period of maximum risk. Getting out of driveways in reverse, |
| 1:46.9 | right, is exactly one of those kinds of situations. There are small children who live on residential |
| 1:52.6 | seats. If you're just simply looking in the side, Mary's overlooking them, having this thing mandated |
| 1:57.9 | in the back essentially is good. The question, however, are more complicated than that because |
| 2:03.5 | it turns out there is a voluntary market for putting these things into place. At the time, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

