1/2: SCOTUS: Moore et ux v. United States invites the wealth tax in. Richard Epstein, Hoover Institution
The John Batchelor Show
John Batchelor
4.5 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 22 June 2024
⏱️ 15 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
1/2: SCOTUS: Moore et ux v. United States invites the wealth tax in. Richard Epstein, Hoover Institution
https://www.wsj.com/articles/moore-v-u-s-supreme-court-mandatory-repatriation-tax-brett-kavanaugh-amy-coney-barrett-23d99510?mod=editorials_article_pos1
1930 SCOTUS
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is a series, |
| 0:05.0 | this is CBS, I on the world. I'm John Bachelor. |
| 0:08.0 | The case from the Supreme Court of the United States, |
| 0:11.0 | Moore at Ox and Wife versus United States, argued |
| 0:15.1 | December 5, 2023, decided June 20, 2024. |
| 0:21.6 | I welcome Professor Richard Epstein of the Hoover Institution of Senior Fellow Teachers Law |
| 0:25.7 | University of Chicago and NYU to comment on petitioners Charles and Kathleen Moore invested in the American |
| 0:34.2 | controlled foreign corporation Kissencraft. From 2006 to 2017, Kissencraft |
| 0:41.3 | generated a great deal of income but did not distribute that income |
| 0:46.0 | to its American shareholders. |
| 0:48.3 | At the end of 2017 tax year, application of the new MRT, that is the tax case, the tax question in at the |
| 1:00.0 | center of this, the mandatory repatriation tax of the Trump administration. The |
| 1:05.2 | MRT resulted in a tax bill of 14,729 on the Moors pro-rate a share of Kissoncraft's |
| 1:12.4 | accumulated income from 2006 to 2017. |
| 1:17.0 | The Moors paid the tax and then sued for a refund claiming among other things that the mandatory |
| 1:25.0 | repatriation tax violated the direct tax clause of the Constitution |
| 1:31.0 | because in the Moore's view the MRT was an unapportioned direct |
| 1:36.2 | tax on their shares of Kissencraft stock. The direct the district court |
| 1:42.4 | dismissed the suit the ninth court affirmed. |
| 1:45.5 | The Supreme Court has now said it is constitutional to tax that income from 2006 to 2017. I turned to the Wall State Journal editorial page |
| 1:57.1 | and learned a Supreme Court mistake on wealth taxes. Five justices open the door to taxing unrealized gains in assets. |
| 2:07.0 | Democrats will walk through it. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

