This is a studio both and production.

When it comes to Israel Keys' Washington victims, I've never believed that there were only four.

And over time, and by paying great attention to how Keyes described these murders,

I feel fairly confident that I know how Keyes used semantics to mislead the FBI without actually lying to them.

In those conversations, there's an undercurrent of specificity.

Throughout the course of his FBI interviews and in his writings confiscated from his cell,

Keyes essentially lays out the following about his Washington state victims. There were two unrelated

victims killed on separate incidents and then disposed of using his boat. There was a male

female couple who were killed during the same incident. The woman was killed first, and Keyes

accidentally killed the man while trying to subdue him with a shovel.

At least one of his Washington victims was killed in the eastern jurisdiction of the state, presumably in the area of Ellensburg.

As best we can tell from the files and audio made available to us, and my conversations with Agent Ted Hala,

this is all we know for certain about Washington-specific victims.

But, by Hala's logic, there would have been at least one more, because if Hala truly believes

Keyes did not commit any murders until after the

army, the victim ruled accidental would have to be a Washington state victim as well.

Keyes said that victim was a long, long time ago.

Additionally, Keyes told us that his first murder went perfectly and just as planned, which would

rule out the male-female couple where he accidentally killed the male, and it would rule out

the person ruled accidental, where he didn't have enough time to finish things up and had to leave

the victim out in the open. So either Halla is right that Keyes didn't murder until after the army, but wrong that

there are only four Washington victims.

...