This is it, boys, a landmark case against Meta and YouTube arguing that they are responsible for their algorithms and the addictive nature of these platforms.

They've been ordered to pay $3 million in damages.

Not only do we have this landmark case, but another fine issued in New Mexico for $375 million

to Facebook over harm to children.

Now, what does this mean?

If YouTube is liable, not for the content, but for the delivery mechanism itself, then

there is no delivery mechanism they can have.

That means content must just be without algorithm

based on you subscribing and that's what you get. Discovery has to be organic. Now, I don't know

how this will play out, but we did just have a hearing on Section 230 a week or so ago,

and that is the protection that allows it or that shields these platforms

from liability if a third party makes a comment on their platform. So let's say I say something

like that the AG in Virginia tried to kick a dog, right? He can't sue YouTube for it because

I'm the one who said it. The truth is he actually did try to kick a dog,

so I didn't make that up anyway, and the truth is an absolute defense. But what's interesting now

is, based on what we are seeing and arguments being made, section 230 may get blown up,

which is a component in ending the independent media space on social media and turning the clock

back to a time when there were only a

handful of channels and a handful of approved commentators. I think that's where we're going to

be going to talk about that. Plus, ladies and gentlemen, we are going to the moon. NASA has announced

$20 billion to go to the moon, build a moon base. So we're going to talk about that stuff. And then,

yeah, I guess there's Iran war stuff.

...