Hello, and welcome to your questions answered another podcast where I get a member of the

What Culture Wrestling team and ask them all the questions you want to know the answers

do in the world of wrestling. But before we get into it, if you're a fan of this sort of

thing, make sure you subscribe to What Culture Wrestling on either iTunes, Spotify,

review your podcast from four daily wrestling podcasts where we review rules, Smackdown,

the Wizard World between AW and NXT, pay me views, we have interviews, round table discussions,

and a roundup of the week complete, where the bloody quiz, of course, on wrestling culture.

As I said, I'm Adam Wilborn, and joining me today to take on the Q&A community is one

Andy Murray, Andy, we do this on a regular basis on the news, but I think I've found some

ones that we haven't tackled. And let's dive straight into it, Andy, a question here from

the hero on Twitter who says, with Andrade leaving, it seems like every time WWE get a new and

upcoming great talent, they let them slip through their fingers. Do you think Vince is living in the

past and overreliant on older wrestlers too much? What do you reckon? Are WWE living their past?

Are they too reliant upon legends or just old guys?

So to kind of preface this, there are effective ways to use old guys in pro wrestling, right?

There are ways to kind of honour what these people have done for your business and the business

as a whole and use them in beneficial ways that lift up younger wrestlers rather than leave them

flattened by a jackhammer at a Saudi Arabian pay per view in 2020, the Fiend and Goldberg.

So when we often have this debate, I think a lot of people take it as, these guys hate all the legends

and everything else, but I think it's fair to say from WWE's use of legends that yes, Vince McMahon

often uses them to the detriment of his younger wrestlers rather than using them to boot people

over. I guess you could look at something like Goldberg versus Drew McIntyre this year at the Royal

...