We've got plenty to talk about this week, Molly. I think we should start right off the

bat with the 4 count 45 page indictment drop by Jack Smith on the former President and

leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. Not shocking, right?

Well, yes and no. It actually, everything feels very surreal and shocking and then also

we expected this. But to see just how poorly written the indictment is is very surprising

to me. It's basically like a like even worse version of the J6 committee report and it's

as if they never spoke to a single person outside of an MSNBC audience or host. Like it

actually reads like if a particularly uninformed MSNBC viewer were to be given the powers of

a special prosecutor. Or what do you think? Did you? Did you find it to me? No. I don't know how to

frame. I have such a frame at this way. I think that people have a lot of trouble disconnecting

Donald Trump from their thinking. So when they're talking about this, these indictments,

for instance, they're like, oh my God, look how terrible Trump was. And honestly, I agree

with that. But there's these indictments are an attack on the first amendment as I see them.

I mean, everything is linked to speech and and and the ability of the government to

bore into the soul of Donald Trump and discern whether he believed what he was saying or didn't

believe what he was saying. And that is not the job of the state. This is a political

clearly to me, everything in this indictment that I read. I'm not a lawyer, but everything

seems to be a political issue. These are issues that you can impeach someone over or a voter

cannot vote for a person again or ever, but it is not it is not the kind of thing that

should be transposed into the legal realm. Yeah. I think it's I think it's worse than that.

I mean, the definitely attacks on the speech. One of the things is so interesting to me about

how the left has responded to all sorts of things in the last 10 years is to work to take

...