For those of you watching who are wondering why we're transitioning sort of into the

spaces of the climate conversation, rising energy prices, soaring food prices, things

like this, we have to understand what we're laying out here, the evidence we're laying

out here, this is the same apparatus, this same overlay is being used to steer the conversation,

to steer the science surrounding these debates and to drive the new restrictions that we're

seeing.

Even in February of this year, you can see the prepositioning, this was in the hill,

this was a headline, coming soon, climate lockdowns.

Now there's a question mark there, excuse me, but that's the prepositioning.

And now we have the current headlines out of the European Union, we've reported on that,

they're being hit very hard with energy restrictions.

EU crisis chief calls for more power to fight climate impacts over in France, we have this

great reset, French government to recruit 3,000 green police over climate change.

And so this conversation around climate change, the science, it's been in question for quite

some time, 2014, there was a study looking at kind of the information surrounding this

and how it's been presented.

And even back then, the researchers in this article say it appears that news media and some

pro environmental organizations have the tendency to accentuate or even exaggerate the

damage caused by climate change.

We find that the information manipulation has an instrumental value, meaning it can drive

policy.

Now it was in 2014 and that was way before this apparatus has been built.

...