meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Yes, Supreme Court Decisions Really Matter

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Slate Audio

News Commentary,, Government, News

4.6 • 3.4K Ratings

🗓️ 28 February 2026

⏱️ 59 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

“Not on the level” is how Donald Verrilli Jr. describes the Trump administration’s general, current Supreme Court practices. The former United States Solicitor General joins Dahlia Lithwick to discuss the ways this radical new posture is forcing judges to confront arguments and asserted powers previously seen as far beyond presidential authority, while still trying not to shift excessive power to courts by routinely declaring everything a pretext. They discuss whether Chief Justice John Roberts is at last signalling skepticism about Trump’s chaotic policymaking, whether the DOJ’s fluid relationship with facts is taking a toll on its credibility, and they debate the costs of delayed, splintered opinions in the major confrontation over executive power evident in the tariffs case. Don Verrilli also reflects on his deep and broad experience over decades of Supreme Court litigation, beginning with a clerkship for Justice Brennan in the 1980s, through his service in government under President Obama, to recent wins arguing before SCOTUS, to provide a truly clarifying perspective on the scale of the challenges facing the rule of law, and the “hard-nosed faith” required to overcome them. 


And… introducing… Executive Dysfunction. A brand new newsletter from Slate’s jurisprudence team that surfaces under-the-radar stories about what Trump is doing to the law –– and how the law is pushing back. There’s always some story buried in court filings, hidden in regulatory fine print, happening in some courthouse you may not have heard of that actually matters. Every week, Executive Dysfunction will feature one story that cuts through it all, plus updates from the Slate Jurisprudence team. Go to slate.com/dysfunction to sign up.


Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.

Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Amicus. Slate's podcast about the courts in the law. I'm Dahlia Lithwick.

0:10.2

Are they still invited to your state of the union next week? They are invited, barely.

0:14.8

They're articulating the idea that, no, we have a rule of law. We're standing up for the rule of law.

0:19.1

Three are happily invited. No, no. They're barely, they're barely invited.

0:23.7

Honestly, I couldn't care less if they come.

0:26.1

We'll even stand up for the rule of law knowing we're going to be criticized and maybe

0:29.1

at some risk for doing it, but we're going to do that.

0:32.2

Keeping that idea alive and vital and a source of energy is really, really important.

0:47.2

The last seven days since last we spoke have seen a pitched battle of dueling op-ed pieces over last week's tariff ruling, and what it does or doesn't

0:58.0

tell us about this shifting axis of power and control that exists between the Supreme Court and

1:03.4

President Donald Trump, about whether to take the Roberts Court seriously and literally as an institution

1:09.5

that can constrain this president or whether

1:12.3

placing quote unquote good outcomes from a stacked and captured court into the wind column is just

1:19.1

hopelessly naive. And while this is by no means going to be a show about the theatrics and the optics

1:25.3

of Trump v. the Supreme Court post post-tariffs, or what we could

1:29.2

glean from the longest, most hateful state of the union speech in history, it is a show about

1:34.7

Trump versus the judicial branch, and specifically the court that sits at its head, far more

1:40.0

consequential than Trump's declaration of the withdrawal of capital letters from SCOTUS, or his

1:46.1

description of justices on the highest court in the land as fools and lapdogs for failing to be his

1:51.7

fools and lap dogs, there is still a meaningful question about whether they can and will stop him

1:57.3

and when. So this is the theme along which we are trying to live, and we want to focus

2:02.2

in on it this week, where the law really, really matters, and where the Supreme Court's decisions

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Audio, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Audio and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.