Hello and welcome to the Raw Review. I'm Adam Wilborn from What Cools You're Join by

the Deadly Boys of What Cools You're Michael Handler and Michael Citrus. Look back on last

night's episode of Monday Night Raw. But before we get into it for a fan of this sort of thing,

make sure you subscribe to What Cool Tressing on either iTunes, Spotify,

or even get your podcasts from for daily wrestling podcasts. We're not only review Monday Night

Raw, but also SmackDown, NXT 2.8 AW Dynamite, AW Rampage, pay the views. We have interviews,

round table discussions, and a round of the week complete. We're going to go quiz, of course,

on WrestleCouge. As I said, join by Hamflit and Citrus. Or we'll be joining by Michael

Handler in due course, right now, join by Michael Citrus to discuss Monday Night Raw.

And it was good again. It wasn't. Oh, it wasn't. The format of the show, the plot holes

with which they arrive at main events in PromJu matches. I genuinely believe the format of

the show means that WWE Raw and the E-Precious WWE SmackDown are automatically bad.

Seriously, someone pointed out on Twitter. What was the cage doing there? Could they not have

baked in some kind of storyline explanation for why the cage would be there before the events of

the show necessitated the cage, but you can't get a cage from thin air. The cage was there first,

and then the plot development that warranted the cage happened after. So why is the cage there?

It's too good. At least I'm out of traction. I'm not disagreeing with the tweet.

I'm saying that this is not a special case. The events of this show are arrived at in the most

convenient way imaginable. If there were no arguments or no one bested such and such PS and

developed for a match, there would be no matches. It's the most convenient plot hole written

rubbish, even when the angles are good and they don't even do angles that just do promo battles.

So that's irrelevant. Even when the action's hot, it's still a little bit soulless,

...