Coming up on this episode of the roundtable.

It looks like this court is going to put the onus on Congress or on state legislatures

to make explicit what is already implicit in the first and second and fourth

amendments just to name a few which is that in fact the Constitution does

apply in cyberspace I'm old enough to remember law school and my lefty professors would say like look the Constitution has to follow the flag.

Otherwise, you know, you can you can have backdoor tyranny, kind of authoritarianism flowing in and pointing to you know places like the

Philippines or whatever where America got into the colonialism business and at the time you

know it seemed to see the little quaint. There was some

consternation over Iraq and all that, but those chickens have very much come

home to roost. We need federal legislation, state-level legislation making clear that we are all willing to take the

risk of actually remaining the United States of America in the digital age, although it may be inconvenient or slightly

more arduous path than that taken by great collectivist regimes elsewhere.

And rant. Do you do? Hello and welcome once again to the roundtable. Your weekly publishers and editors podcast here at the American Mind.

I'm your host for today, Seth Barron, managing editor of the American Mind.

I'm joined by editor James Pulos and Spencer Clavin special editor of the American

mind and associate editor of the Claremont Review of Books. Well today which is Wednesday, the Supreme Court came down with a decision regarding a long-awaited

First Amendment-related case. Murphy versus Missouri was originally brought by attorneys general from

Louisiana and Missouri and then joined by other interested parties against

the Biden administration.

Following the release of the Twitter files,

it emerged that the Biden White House

had engaged in a long process of communication with social media companies regarding what they considered

...