Okay dokey, well, that is England, Belgium. Belgium 2.

England nil.

I just took a cursory glance at the statistics from that game, Alex,

and I saw that England had more shots, more shots on target,

higher level of percent.

A percent possession?

I don't know what I'm saying.

Less fouls, more corners.

If you were to look at that, you might think,

that's a team that was on top of the game and would win two-nil. You know, Belgium significantly

more fouls. But no, the World Cup surprises again. It's almost like looking at stats afterwards.

Can't tell you that much about the game out of context or something like that.

Yeah, I think that one of the strongest indications, particularly since the round of 16, started,

is the team with the lower possession has a very good chance of having been the winner.

Well, that's a theme, isn't it?

That's a trend.

It's a trend in tournament football in terms of teams sitting deep and looking to counter.

Belgium, we know, having seen it a few times, most notably against Japan, are a very good counter-attacking side.

Yeah.

When they're carrying the ball through the centre with DeBreiner and then looking to spring it wide.

So fast.

So fast.

...