Oh, yay. Oh, yay. Oh, yay. Oh, yeah. The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.

Unless there is any more question, we have to find an argument in this case.

All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to give their attention.

Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unpredictable, unpredictable Supreme Court

podcast. I'm Dan Apps.

And I'm Will Bowd.

Let's keep talking with the ShadowDocket.

Yeah, more to say here.

So let's jump right down.

This is the fundamental problem with the shadow docket, is that a huge amount of it is for error

correction. And everybody believes the court should do some kind of error correction.

There's something like really bad and the court could stop it and legally wrong and the

court should stop it. But then once we go down that road, there are all these heuristics

and biases for like what kinds of errors you want to

correct that we don't deal with in a fair or systematic way. Does everybody believe that? I mean,

some people just say, look, the court is not about one-off cases. It's just about getting the big

legal principles right. I mean, just as Scalia said things that sounded like that at points.

I mean, obviously, I don't think he lived up to that because I think you can point to him signing on to things that are error correction.

But he said stuff like that.

I mean, he said stuff like, yeah, I guess I'll stand by that.

I think there's nobody who has zero cases of error correction that they support.

There's nobody who would say, you know, yes, if a lower credit issue is a nationwide injunction

...