Winning Without Winning

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Government, Politics

4.7 • 4K Ratings

🗓️ 4 July 2024

⏱️ 111 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On today’s super-mega-extravagant episode, Sarah and David celebrate America’s birthday by gifting everyone a magnificently long podcast. First on the docket: more analysis of the SCOTUS immunity decision. The Agenda: —Facial challenges in Moody v. NetChoice —Welcome, Father of the Pod —Should prosecutors be totally immune? —No more bad science! —Ongoing debate over Section 230 —Romney: Corporations are people too! —Donald Trump’s Florida and Georgia cases —Is the pod over yet? Nope! —Dred Scott vibes Show Notes: —Husband of the Pod’s Wall Street Journal op-ed Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	You ready?
0:02.0	I was born ready. Hey! advisory opinions and boy is it going to be an advisory opinions today.
0:25.0	David we're gonna have to just do it all today as long as it takes okay man?
0:31.0	Yeah let's buckle up.
0:32.0	All right we've got to do some more on
0:34.6	Trump immunity including footnote three, net choice, corner post, the orders
0:39.1	list, and bankruptcy with a special guest, all in today's advisory opinions.
0:44.5	So let's dive right in.
0:46.8	I want to get to some of our continuing discussions
0:50.6	on immunity that you and I have been having.
0:52.8	Also, just some interesting, you know,
0:55.5	emails, texts that I've been getting from smart lawyers
0:58.2	as they're thinking through this.
0:59.7	But I thought maybe the place we could start
1:02.0	was footnote three.
1:04.0	Yes.
1:05.0	Which as soon as we stopped recording, you and I were both like,
1:08.5	how are you thinking about footnote three?
1:10.6	What does this mean? So I'm just going to read footnote 3 and let's do a little breakdown,
1:17.1	okay? All right, so here's the sentence that footnote 3 is footnoting.
1:20.5	Although such tools may suffice to protect the constitutional rights of individual criminal defendants,
1:25.5	the interests that underlie presidential immunity seek to protect not the president himself, but the institution of the presidency.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.