Will The Supreme Court Grant Alex Murdaugh A New Trial?-2024 Year in Review
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
True Crime Today
3.3 • 907 Ratings
🗓️ 24 December 2024
⏱️ 7 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.
Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | You're listening to 2004 in review, a look back at some of the most compelling conversations and stories of the year from True Crime Today and the Hidden Killers podcast. |
| 0:12.2 | The evidence is gone, but the nightmare continues. |
| 0:15.3 | Welcome to Hidden Killers with Tony Bruske, featuring former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Fattis. |
| 0:21.2 | Precedent setting. We were talking about that a little bit earlier where they could say, |
| 0:26.5 | you know what, we don't think this is that big of a deal. We think it all went good. You're going |
| 0:30.5 | back to where you came from. Or, yeah, there was a problem here with the jury and tampering, |
| 0:37.4 | and we need to evaluate it. Either way, a precedent a problem here with, uh, with the jury and tampering and we need to evaluate it. |
| 0:39.1 | Either way, a precedent is set. |
| 0:41.7 | Um, that's not a very good precedent. |
| 0:43.4 | If, if the Supreme Court is going to say, well, you know, in this case, we had one juror that is claiming this. |
| 0:49.9 | We have Becky over here that's saying this. |
| 0:52.9 | And there's some pretty strong evidence of jury tampering that did happen here. |
| 0:58.3 | But then to just say, no, we're not going to do anything about it. |
| 1:02.1 | That doesn't seem like a Supreme Court move to me. |
| 1:06.1 | And that's what Alec Murdoch's attorneys are saying in their motion for a new trial, too. |
| 1:10.7 | So at the trial court level, we're talking about legal standards to overturn a conviction That's what Alec Murdoch's attorneys are saying in their motion for a new trial, too. |
| 1:14.9 | So at the trial court level, we're talking about legal standards to overturn a conviction. |
| 1:20.3 | Trial court is essentially saying, hey, this one juror, that wouldn't have changed the outcome here. |
| 1:22.5 | It wouldn't have resulted in a not guilty verdict. |
| 1:25.3 | But the defense is saying, hey, so what? |
| 1:29.7 | Even if that's true, the jury tampering alone is so problematic, |
| 1:36.0 | so antithetical to a person's right to a fair trial, that you have to give great weight to that and overturn it even if, you know, that standard of, you know, having a different outcome but |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.