This is Hidden Killers Week in review.

I look back at the most prolific stories of the week.

This is continuing coverage of United States versus Sean Diddy Combs from the Hidden

Killers podcast and true crime today.

It came and it went the trial of Sean Diddy Combs.

A lot faster than I think a lot of us expected it to, but here we are.

We're at the end.

You may be listening to this after there's a verdict or seeing this after a verdict or while they're deliberating or right before because we're all in this very tight place right now.

It's a legal chess match that's been unfolding in the federal trial of Sean Diddy Combs.

Case has been packed with sex trafficking charges, graphic evidence, and a defense team that

just dropped the mic. Like, we're not, we're good. Go on, continue on. But by saying absolutely

nothing, really, no witnesses, no Diddy on the stand, just a quiet gamble that the jury shrugs and says,

okay, well, let's see. What that strategy is, I don't know, was it a flex, a white flag to break it all down?

I'm bringing someone in who's been on both sides of the courtroom, defense attorney and former prosecutor,

Eric Fattis. Let's dive into that. No witnesses being called by the

defense of Diddy. A lot of ways of looking at this. How are you looking at this?

Now it's a risk. It's a bold move. Does it signal confidence? Does it say that the defense believes the prosecution hasn't

met their burden? It's their job to put on the evidence and meet that legal threshold.

They haven't done it. We're not going to help them from the defense side. Or is it some kind

of tacit admission that they don't have a lot of folks who are going to back up their

narrative. And so let's give it to the jury and hope for the best.

Do you find it hard to really grasp what the strategy is in this case, since we can't hear

...