Research that resonates.

Schweitzer has not been wrong on any of his years and years of reporting on the Biden's.

Investigations that matter.

If your last name wasn't Biden, do you think you would have been asked to be on the board of Burisma?

I don't know. I don't know. Probably not. But that's, you know, I don't think that there's a lot of things that would have happened in my life that if my last name wasn't fired.

The only entities, the only people that would report on this, and Peter Schweizer, who deserves a Medal of Freedom in my view.

This is The Drill Down with Peter Schweitzer. Hi, this is Peter Schweitzer, and welcome to The Drill Down,

where we relentlessly expose cronyism, corruption, and the abuse of power in Washington, D.C.

seated by my side, as always, Eric Eggers. Eric, how are you? I'm excellent, Peter. I mean,

a lower profile than you, but I'm okay. Well, we're going to have a very

different conversation today than we usually have. Usually we talk about investigations,

things we've talked about that are in public. Today, we're going to go in the deep, dark bowels

of history. And this is a result of the New York Times, we're in a series of articles

this past week, basically exposing the fact, that's the term they would use, that GAI talks to

and has conversations with the FBI. We're going to go through and give the audience today a history

that takes you from the 2015 Clinton Foundation investigations

all through the current Biden investigations and discuss in detail how these events in sort of a

bizarre way are interconnected and related based on the work that we've done and based on

contacts that we've had with various government bodies.

Okay, you said just like a lot of words, but I think it's important for people that are listening to this, just to just breathe for a second.

Let me just say it again in a way that the listener might be able to understand.

So this week, twice in the last week, the New York Times, the prestigious standard of journalism, has, in your

...