meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

Will SCOTUS Overrule Roe v. Wade?

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Heritage Foundation

Government

4.5527 Ratings

🗓️ 3 December 2021

⏱️ 43 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Abortion is on the docket this week as the Court hears oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which asks the Court to overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Dobbs filled this week's headlines, but the Court heard several other important cases too. Your hosts discuss them all, saving the oral arguments in Dobbs for after GianCarlo's interview of renowned legal theorist and political philosopher Robert P. George. Professor George explains the history of the Court's abortion jurisprudence, its relation to our American legal and philosophical tradition, and the implications of Dobbs. He also gives his prediction of how the case will turn out and what overruling Roe and Casey would mean for the future of the pro-life movement. After that, GianCarlo summarizes the Dobbs oral arguments, and Zack peppers him with trivia about the Court's abortion cases.


Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.


Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!


Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the court.

0:06.0

I'm John Carlo Canoparo.

0:07.8

I'm Zach Smith.

0:09.0

And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court,

0:13.9

what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government.

0:21.2

Well, folks, this was it, the big week.

0:24.4

Oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, the case that urges the court to overrule Roe

0:29.8

versus Wade and Planned Parenthood versus Casey.

0:33.3

But before we talk about that, G.C., we have some other ground to cover, so let's get right to it.

0:38.1

Were there any notable orders or our opinion since our last show?

0:41.5

One notable issue in the case of Arlene's Flowers v. Washington, the parties jointly dismissed that case.

0:48.7

Arlene's flowers involved a florist who refused on religious grounds to make an arrangement for a same-sex wedding

0:54.4

and raised many of the issues left unresolved when the Supreme Court decided masterpiece

0:59.3

cake shop on narrow grounds.

1:02.0

The dismissal follows the court's earlier refusal to take the case and came while a request

1:07.2

to reconsider that decision was still pending.

1:10.5

Since our last episode, there's been one notable grant, and we also have our first opinion of the term.

1:16.1

First up, the grant.

1:17.5

This was in the case of Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.

1:23.2

The issue there is whether Republican members of the state's House and Senate can intervene

1:27.5

to defend the state's voter ID law when the Democratic Attorney General is already doing so,

1:33.1

but not in the view of the Republican representatives well enough.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.