meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Why, Wisconsin?

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Slate Audio

News Commentary,, Government, News

4.6 • 3.4K Ratings

🗓️ 11 April 2020

⏱️ 52 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Marc Elias, chair of Perkins Coie’s Political Law Group, he represents the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Party of Wisconsin. Together, they reconstruct how the Supreme Court stepped into Wisconsin’s April election, and what the path to that decision—and the fallout from it—can teach us ahead of November.  In the Slate Plus segment, Mark Joseph Stern talks about Mitch McConnell’s continued campaign to stack the judiciary, the dissonance between conservative positions on election law and reproductive rights in the time of COVID, and the piece he wishes he and Dahlia had written together this week, but didn’t. Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show. Podcast production by Sara Burningham. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, Slate listeners! We have an important message for you. By now, you probably already know about Slate's

0:07.2

membership program called Slate Plus. It is a subscription that gives you ad-free versions of every

0:13.6

single Slate podcast. You can get this show and other shows you love like Dear Prudence and

0:19.2

the political gabfest, all without any ad breaks. But if you're a reader of Slate as well as a

0:25.0

listener, you may have noticed that Slate.com recently installed a paywall. We wanted you to know

0:31.2

that a Slate Plus membership will also give you access to everything on the website. From our

0:37.0

recent coverage of the coronavirus to who counts our ongoing investigation into whose voices will

0:43.0

be left out of the 2020 election, we are committed to keeping you informed about absolutely everything

0:49.1

that this crazy year has in store. And your support is extremely important to helping us

0:54.2

continue this important work. You can sign up for Slate Plus now at Slate.com slash anicus plus.

1:01.4

And if you're already a member, just log in at Slate.com slash log in.

1:12.2

If in fact your goal is to be just a neutral umpire and not involve the courts in the political

1:17.8

thicket, why why get involved in that case? Why write an opinion?

1:26.9

Hi and welcome back to amicus. This is Slate's podcast about the law and the courts and the rule

1:32.5

of law and the Supreme Court. And I hope that you and your loved ones are doing okay. And we thank

1:41.0

you for sharing a little bit of your stay at home time with us this week. So look not very long

1:46.7

ago, although it feels like it was a lifetime ago, we did a huge election meltdown series on voting

1:53.4

in the 2020 election and all the ways that that election might not be reflective of the national will

1:59.7

that it might not be free and fair. And all that happened before coronavirus hit. And we could not

2:07.1

go another show without discussing Wisconsin and mail in balloting, absentee balloting. And of course

2:13.3

now the US Supreme Court, which has inserted itself right into the heart of all these issues this

2:19.1

week. So this past week, the highest court in the land, which is not to be sure hearing oral

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Audio, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Audio and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.