Why We Want What Tom Ripley Has
Critics at Large | The New Yorker
The New Yorker
4.4 • 679 Ratings
🗓️ 8 August 2024
⏱️ 52 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
In her 1955 novel, “The Talented Mr. Ripley,” Patricia Highsmith introduced readers to the figure of Tom Ripley, an antihero who covets the good life, and achieves it—by stealing it from someone else. On this episode of Critics at Large, the staff writers Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz discuss the long tail of Highsmith’s work, which has been revived in adaptations like René Clément’s 1960 classic, “Purple Noon”; the definitive 1999 film starring Matt Damon and Jude Law; and this year’s Netflix series, “Ripley,” which casts its protagonist as a lonely middle-aged con man. In all three versions, Dickie Greenleaf, a wealthy acquaintance of Ripley’s, becomes his obsession and eventually his victim. The story resonates today in part because we’re all in the habit of observing—and coveting—the life styles of the rich and famous. Social media gives users endless opportunities to study how others live, such as the places they go, the meals they consume, and the objects they possess. “One of the reasons that the character of Ripley is forever sympathetic is the yearning and striving to be something other than himself, following an example that’s set out to him,” Fry says. “For him, it’s someone like Dickie. For us, it might be someone online.”
Read, watch, and listen with the critics:
“The Talented Mr. Ripley,” by Patricia Highsmith
“The Talented Mr. Ripley” (1999)
“Purple Noon” (1960)
“Ripley” (2024)
“Saltburn” (2023)
“The White Lotus” (2021—)
This episode originally aired on April 4, 2024. New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome to Critics at Large, a podcast from The New Yorker. |
| 0:06.9 | I'm Vincent Cunningham. |
| 0:08.0 | I'm Alex Schwartz. |
| 0:09.2 | And I'm Nomi Fry. |
| 0:10.5 | Each week on this show, we make sense of what's happening in the culture right now and how we got here. |
| 0:15.9 | Hi, guys. |
| 0:16.6 | Hello. |
| 0:24.0 | All right, before we go into the episode, we got some announcements for you. |
| 0:27.8 | Over the next few weeks, we're going to be doing something just a little bit different. |
| 0:32.0 | Something that I think we're all pretty excited about. |
| 0:34.3 | Yeah, we have so many colleagues at The New Yorker who are immersed in their own |
| 0:38.2 | areas of expertise, and we decided we needed to tap that resource. That's right. So we're going to be |
| 0:43.1 | tapping. And for our next three episodes, each of us has picked one New Yorker colleague to be |
| 0:49.2 | a guest critic on critics at large. I'm going to talk with my friend and colleague Jennifer Wilson about why our culture |
| 0:56.6 | has become obsessed with all things woo. |
| 0:59.8 | I'm sure you've noticed this that over the last five years, everyone I know has downloaded |
| 1:03.5 | their astrological chart on their phone. |
| 1:05.4 | I've certainly considered visiting a psychic. |
| 1:07.7 | I mean, you are part of what I'm talking about with Jen. |
| 1:11.6 | Yeah, and I'm talking to our colleague Nick Palmgarten about the city of Las Vegas, |
| 1:16.6 | where he just reported a piece, and specifically we're going to be talking about the mythology we've built around that city. |
| 1:22.6 | Why does Las Vegas loom so large in our collective consciousness? |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The New Yorker, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The New Yorker and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

