meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Gray Area with Sean Illing

Why politics needs more conflict, not less

The Gray Area with Sean Illing

Vox Media Podcast Network

Politics, News, Society & Culture, News Commentary, Philosophy

4.511.1K Ratings

🗓️ 30 October 2017

⏱️ 73 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Here’s a counterintuitive thought: maybe Congress in particular, and politics in general, has too little conflict, not too much. That’s James Wallner’s argument, and it’s more persuasive than you might think. Wallner is a political scientist who became a top Republican Senate aide, working as legislative director for Senators Jeff Sessions and Pat Toomey, as well as executive director of the Senate Steering Committee under Toomey and Lee. He’s now a senior fellow at the R Street Institute, and the author of “The Death of Deliberation: Partisanship and Polarization in the United States Senate.” Wallner is immersed in congressional history and procedure, and one of his conclusions after years of both study and experience is that the leadership in both parties are using the rules to stymie disagreement and suppress chaos — and well-intentioned though this might be, it’s making everything worse. Congress, Wallner believes, is an institution designed to surface conflict so that positions can be made clear, compromises can be tested, and a way forward can be found. That’s not happening now, and the results are disastrous. The Republican Party is particularly bad on this score, he says. “They pretend like they all agree on everything...But if you never deal with your problems, what do you think happens? A break-up! And that's literally what you're seeing right now.” The first few times I hard Wallner’s arguments, I was skeptical. In some ways, I’m still skeptical, as you’ll hear in this conversation. But I’m also convinced he’s onto something important. Books: The Professor's House by Willa Cather Democracy and Leadership by Irving Babbitt Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 by James Madison Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

We don't recognize the legitimacy of debate.

0:04.2

We don't recognize the legitimacy of conflict.

0:08.0

And so when we disagree with people, what do we do?

0:10.4

We try to say they don't have a right to say what they're saying.

0:13.6

It's illegitimate.

0:14.6

And once you no longer have a legitimate view,

0:16.6

I don't have to listen to you.

0:30.6

Hello, welcome to The Asher Klein show on the box media podcast network.

0:34.4

Before we jump into the show today,

0:36.2

I want to put in a plug for the impact by Sarah Cliff, my friend and my colleague

0:41.6

and America's best policy reporter.

0:43.6

She has done this phenomenal, phenomenal podcast.

0:46.6

You heard a taste of it last week on this feed about healthcare

0:50.6

and about connecting the way policy actually plays out in people's lives.

0:54.2

So the reason I want to mention it again is that the recent episode

0:58.0

of Plain Crash Hospitals versus Car Crash Hospitals is one of the most emotionally powerful

1:04.0

pieces of policy journals I've ever heard.

1:06.0

It is not a happy listen necessarily,

1:12.0

although the broad trend is very hopeful,

1:14.0

but what she's describing that we can do about medical errors is very hopeful.

1:18.0

But she tells a story of a child who died from an infection

1:24.0

that is very, very common in America.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Vox Media Podcast Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Vox Media Podcast Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.