Why People Think Diddy’s Team Is “Winning” & How He Might Get A Mistrial!

Rotten Mango

Stephanie Soo

True Crime, Comedy, Society & Culture

4.8 • 25.7K Ratings

🗓️ 9 June 2025

⏱️ 139 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A mistrial. Sean Diddy Comb’s legal team has just filed for another mistrial, alleging that the prosecutors knew that Cassie was lying on the stand and still allowed her to testify. This entire fight centers around a 2016 balcony incident, in which Cassie and her friend Bona allege that Combs dangled Bona off the balcony. The defense argues that this incident never even happened. This makes it sound like the defense is grasping at straws to get a mistrial. However, the energy in the courtroom has been interesting lately. The defense has been taking some large “wins” in cross examinations. Some netizens believe that their biggest win yet was “taking down” the second victim to testify, Mia. Netizens believe that the defense has completely dismantled her story and that she came off “unlikeable” on the stand. But the prosecutors argue that all the defense did was harass, argue, and further traumatize a victim on the stand. Prosecutors argue that the cross examination was so brutal and humiliating that it might deter future victims from testifying in criminal cases. So which one is true? This is the testimony of Mia.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Bada being baddaboo.
0:02.0	Mia is not Mia's real name.
0:05.0	She is testifying against Sean Combs with a pseudonym.
0:09.0	The understanding could not be clearer.
0:11.0	If you know who she is, no you don't.
0:14.0	If you don't know who she is, keep it that way.
0:16.0	It's a pretty basic understanding.
0:18.0	But midway through Mia's multiple day- long testimony, Prosecutor Johnson stands up.
0:23.2	Sorry, Your Honor, one additional issue we just wanted to put on the court's radar. The government
0:27.6	has become aware of an individual who's broken the court's pseudonym order in respect to Mia.
0:32.2	The individual was present in the courtroom yesterday, and the government saw the individual
0:35.8	outside the courtroom at the end of the
0:37.8	court day broadcasting her name in a public square right outside the courthouse. We've seen his
0:43.0	YouTube channel in which he says Mia's true name and we saw that same individual in the courtroom yesterday.
0:49.9	And this is becoming a problem. Even with Jane, the new witness on the stand, her attorney has
0:54.9	even come forward to tell the court, I just wanted to bring this to the court's attention,
0:58.7	that there are media outlets, YouTube accounts, Instagram accounts, and others that are seeking
1:03.6	to discover and or to reveal Jane's identity. These are active attempts and some are ongoing,
1:09.8	and many of these accounts and outlets have many readers and followers.
1:12.6	And so that is why I felt it was important to make this in a timely manner this notice to the court.
1:17.6	These posts and media outlets threaten her safety and privacy.
1:21.6	I'm just so confused how any of this is happening in 2025.
	...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 22 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Previous episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Stephanie Soo, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Stephanie Soo and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.