meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Why Mark Zuckerberg Is Mistaken to Welcome Federal Regulation of Facebook

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 9 April 2019

⏱️ 14 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

John Samples is author of the new Cato paper, "Why the Government Should Not Regulate Content Moderation of Social Media."

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Kator Daily Podcast for Tuesday, April 9th, 2019. I'm Caleb Brown.

0:08.8

Facebook is backing government regulation of social media in part because they don't want to be put

0:14.3

in a position where Facebook, a private company, makes decisions about what

0:18.4

constitutes political speech unfit for their platform. John Samples is author of a new Cato policy analysis out today

0:25.4

why the government should not regulate content moderation of social media. It's

0:30.0

available today. In a recent interview with George Stephanopoulos,

0:34.7

Mark Zuckerberg, the head of Facebook,

0:37.4

has called, you know, continued his call for regulation.

0:42.1

And it's not really clear exactly what he wants the government to do but

0:46.7

if you're a student of public choice you're aware that whatever regulatory regime

0:52.4

emerges from the federal government that Facebook will be probably

0:57.6

well equipped to comply with it?

1:00.1

With Mark Zuckerberg, I think there's several things going on.

1:03.9

The times are difficult.

1:05.2

There's lots of calls for regulation,

1:07.5

and he's making some calculations about how

1:10.8

can I get the company through this in as good as shape as possible?

1:16.4

So he's becoming essentially political.

1:20.6

He's trying to be as politically maneuverable as possible to get the company through it.

1:27.4

The other, as you correctly mentioned, the other issue is whether he intends it or not, is you could end up doing things and the

1:35.0

government could end up doing things that will actually cement a monopoly

1:40.0

position one that doesn't exist now. So we have this history with technologies

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.