Why is Rachel Reeves U-turning on income tax?
The Politics Show
The New Statesman
4.2 • 1.5K Ratings
🗓️ 14 November 2025
⏱️ 28 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
After weeks of preparing to break their manifesto pledge, Starmer and Reeves have ditched their plans to raise income tax.
They’re scared it would have angered their MPs and voters, amid a dire performance in the polls.
How will Reeves plug the £30 billion gap in public finances if she doesn’t raise income tax?
Oli Dugmore is joined by Ailbhe Rea and Will Dunn to discuss.
READ: https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/morning-call/2025/11/whats-behind-labours-income-tax-u-turn
LISTEN AD-FREE:
📱Download the New Statesman app
MORE FROM THE NEW STATESMAN:
❓ Ask a question – we answer them every Friday
⏰ Get our daily politics newsletter every morning
✍️ Enjoy the best of our writing via email every Saturday
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | The New Statesman. |
| 0:04.6 | After weeks of preparing to break their manifesto pledge, Starma and Reeves have ditched their plans to raise income tax. |
| 0:11.3 | It seems two factors are at play. First, the eradication of whatever political capital the Labour government had left at the start of the week, with the strange briefing war that erupted. |
| 0:19.5 | Second, an improved fiscal outlook. But how will Reeves plug the remaining £30 billion gap in public finances if she doesn't raise income tax? It's all feeling a little like the convulsions of a fatally wounded animal. I'm Olly Doug Moore. This is the New Statesman podcast. Joining me today's political editor, Alvarez and sketchwriter Will Dunn. Hi, both. Hello. It's a pleasure to break bread with you both for the first time. |
| 0:39.3 | I know. |
| 0:40.3 | Many more meals to be had together, I hope. |
| 0:43.3 | Secondly, I mean, actually Alva, yeah, can you give us the political and narrative context to this story today? |
| 0:50.3 | Well, today, yesterday and the FT, of course, reporting that Reid isn't going to pursue this income tax rise. What's happened? How have we got here? So, Ollie, I'm going to take |
| 0:59.4 | you back to before the election. Way back when? Way back when a happier time for the Labour Party |
| 1:07.0 | in many ways. When they were riding... Unburdened by responsibility. When they were riding high in the polls, but planning for a general election, I understand |
| 1:17.5 | that Labour officials went to Rachel Reeves while they were coming up with the manifesto, |
| 1:22.5 | and they said, look, I think we're really at risk of boxing ourselves in for government |
| 1:26.7 | if we rule out |
| 1:28.5 | increasing taxes on working people. And my understanding is that she replied, that would be a |
| 1:35.6 | nice problem to have. Because I think a thing you have to really understand what the Labour Party is |
| 1:40.0 | that they're very used to losing. And, you know, they have they they have sort of snatched defeat from the Joel's victory many times before. |
| 1:47.5 | You know, Labor's tax bombshell. |
| 1:49.0 | They have been really bitten by this. |
| 1:50.6 | There is a public perception that labor will increase your taxes. |
| 1:54.0 | And they wanted to make sure they had economic credibility. |
| 1:56.8 | They couldn't be hit on that by the Tories. |
| 1:58.5 | So they went into the election campaign wanting to make sure that tax increases were |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The New Statesman, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The New Statesman and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

