meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Why Is Buster Murdaugh Furious About His Father's Retrial?

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

True Crime, News, News Commentary

3.3907 Ratings

🗓️ 23 May 2026

⏱️ 72 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary


 Buster Murdaugh testified for the defense at his father's murder trial and told a jury Alex wasn't capable of killing Maggie and Paul. Then Alex was convicted, and Buster disappeared. Three years of near-silence. Barely any prison calls. A quiet marriage. A life built at distance. Now the South Carolina Supreme Court has reversed the convictions, the retrial is approaching, and sources say Buster isn't relieved — he's reportedly angry, allegedly calling Alex a "selfish old man."

Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke dig into what that anger signals and whether the prosecution can use it. If Buster's loyalty has fractured, everything shifts. He knows what Alex told him privately after the killings. The question is whether any legal mechanism can force those conversations into the open. Coffindaffer also raises a problem embedded in the State's own motive theory: if the case is family annihilation, why is Buster alive? Maggie wouldn't have believed a story about Paul's death if Buster were dead too. That gap sits at the center of the State's narrative before opening statements begin.

Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis addresses the legal architecture of the retrial itself. The Supreme Court found the original trial judge placed the burden on Murdaugh instead of the State and violated Rule 606(b) by probing jurors' mental processes. Twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony was deemed excessive. Faddis identifies what survives in a second trial — the narrow exposure timeline anchoring the motive theory — and what gets stripped out. He also examines Alex Murdaugh's locked-in testimony, the unresolved evidentiary challenges from the direct appeal, and the strategic nightmare of venue and jury selection with Becky Hill's criminal conviction now on the record.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AlexMurdaugh #BusterMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #SCSupremeCourt #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurdaughTrial

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the big breakdown.

0:02.2

A long look back at some of the biggest stories we're covering for you at the Hidden Killers podcast and true crime today.

0:10.4

This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brewski and Robin Drink.

0:17.5

A juror swore under oath that the Colleton County Clerk of Court made her feel like Alec Murdaugh was guilty before deliberations even started.

0:29.3

She had doubts. She voted to convict anyway. Former Chief Justice Gene Toll heard all of it and ruled that's not quite enough she punted it down to the south carolina

0:39.4

supreme court and well that game just ended and the score is five to nothing and alick

0:46.4

murdaw won not a close call at all but on who carries the burden of proof it's going to happen ale. Alec Murdaugh is 99.9% likely to get a new

1:00.1

trial. We're here to talk about that in three different segments this morning. We're going to

1:06.6

dive into how Alec Murdoch is getting new trial, the logistics that put us here,

1:13.3

what may still stand from the first trial, because it's not always just a carbon copy repeat,

1:19.5

and this is not going to be the same thing here either, and what new elements may come in and how

1:25.7

the retrial is going to be different.

1:28.8

We're going to get into all of that this morning here to help us break all that down.

1:33.3

Eric Fattis defense attorney and former prosecutor.

1:35.9

And of course, my co-host, Robin Drake, retired FBI special agency for the counterintelligence

1:40.0

behavioral analysis program.

1:41.9

Welcome, gentlemen, as always this morning.

1:44.8

I've been looking forward to having this conversation with you, Eric, because there's so

1:48.4

many legal things involved here.

1:52.8

Supreme Court said Gene Toll, the judge who, for those of you playing along at home,

1:58.5

there was another hearing after the murder.

2:00.4

It was an appellate hearing.

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 15 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.